Geriatric Polypharmacy Interventions: How to Reduce Adverse Events in Older Adults

alt
Geriatric Polypharmacy Interventions: How to Reduce Adverse Events in Older Adults
13 Comments

Polypharmacy Risk Assessment Tool

Assess Your Medication Risk

This tool identifies potentially inappropriate medications for older adults based on Beers Criteria and STOPP/START guidelines. Remember: This is for educational purposes only. Always consult a healthcare provider before making medication changes.

Results

Risk Assessment High Risk
6.2/10

Estimated risk of adverse drug events (ADEs) based on current medications and age.

This patient is at high risk for adverse drug events due to multiple potentially inappropriate medications.
Potentially Inappropriate Medications
Next Steps

Consider pharmacist-led medication review and deprescribing plan. Contact your healthcare provider for personalized guidance.

Why Polypharmacy Is a Silent Crisis in Older Adults

Imagine an 82-year-old woman taking 12 medications daily: one for blood pressure, two for arthritis, three for cholesterol, a sleep aid, an antidepressant, a proton pump inhibitor, a blood thinner, a diuretic, a vitamin D pill, and two supplements. She doesn’t feel worse - but she’s more likely to fall, get confused, or end up in the hospital. This isn’t rare. In the U.S., nearly 41% of adults over 65 take five or more medications. For nearly one in five, that number jumps to ten or more. These aren’t prescriptions for life - they’re a ticking time bomb.

Polypharmacy - the routine use of five or more drugs - doesn’t happen by accident. It builds up over years: a cardiologist adds a pill, a rheumatologist prescribes another, a primary care doctor keeps renewing them all. No one steps back to ask: Is this still helping? The result? Adverse drug events (ADEs) cause nearly 28% of all hospital admissions in older adults. Many of these are preventable.

What Makes a Medication Inappropriate in Older Adults?

Not all multiple medications are bad. Some are life-saving. The problem is when drugs are prescribed without matching the patient’s goals, life expectancy, or actual needs. The American Geriatrics Society’s Beers Criteria (2023 update) lists 60+ medications that should be avoided or used with extreme caution in older adults. Examples include long-acting benzodiazepines like diazepam, which increase fall risk by 50%, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories like ibuprofen, which can cause kidney failure or stomach bleeds in seniors.

But the Beers Criteria alone aren’t enough. That’s why tools like STOPP/START (v3, 2021) and FORTA are now standard. STOPP identifies potentially inappropriate prescriptions - like giving an anticholinergic for overactive bladder when it causes confusion. START finds missed opportunities - like not prescribing a statin for someone with diabetes and heart disease. One study found that using STOPP/START reduced inappropriate prescribing by 31% in just six months.

Here’s the catch: a drug that’s inappropriate for one person might be essential for another. A blood thinner might be risky for someone with a history of falls - but deadly to stop if they have atrial fibrillation. That’s why blanket rules fail. Personalization is the only path forward.

The Only Intervention That Actually Works

Not all medication reviews are created equal. Researchers classify them into three types:

  • Type I: Just looking at the medication list.
  • Type II: Adding a check for whether the patient is taking them.
  • Type III: Face-to-face (or video) visits with a clinician who reviews medications and the patient’s health status, goals, and symptoms.

Only Type III works. A 2023 JAMA Network Open study found Type III interventions reduced hospital readmissions by 18.3%. Types I and II? No measurable difference. Why? Because you can’t deprescribe safely without understanding the person behind the pills.

Pharmacists leading these reviews are the key. In clinics where pharmacists work under Collaborative Practice Agreements (CPAs), deprescribing rates are 37.6% higher than when doctors work alone. But only 22 U.S. states allow these agreements. In places without them, progress stalls.

And it’s not just about cutting pills. It’s about replacing them. One patient on five sleeping pills was switched to cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia - and stopped needing any medication. Another had his antipsychotic for dementia-related agitation stopped after a behavioral plan was put in place. Both saw improved alertness and fewer falls.

A clinical team using STOPP/START checklist to identify harmful and missing medications for an older adult.

Who Benefits Most - And Who Doesn’t

Not every older adult responds the same way to deprescribing. Research shows the biggest wins are in patients aged 65-79. For them, mortality dropped by nearly 15% after careful medication reviews. For those over 80? The benefit shrinks to 5.2% - and sometimes disappears. Why? Frailty, multiple organ decline, and less time to see benefit from preventive meds.

Patients with dementia see 19.3% less benefit than those without. Why? Because their ability to communicate symptoms is limited. Stopping a medication might cause agitation or withdrawal - but they can’t say, “I feel worse.” That’s why these cases need even more caution, family input, and close monitoring.

And here’s a hidden truth: 38.7% of older adults are undertreated. They’re on too many drugs - but missing essential ones. A diabetic on seven medications might not be on aspirin or a statin. A person with osteoporosis might not be on a bone-strengthening drug. Good deprescribing doesn’t mean fewer pills - it means the right pills.

How Clinicians Are Doing It Right

At Duke University Health System, they use a simple five-step approach:

  1. Get the real medication list - not the one on paper. Call pharmacies. Ask family.
  2. Use STOPP/START or FORTA to flag risky or missing meds.
  3. Review each drug: Why was it started? Is it still needed? What’s the risk of stopping?
  4. Involve the patient. Ask: “What do you hope to get from these pills?”
  5. Plan the taper. Don’t stop cold. Cut one at a time. Monitor for 4-6 weeks.

The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) took this further. They embedded clinical pharmacists in every geriatric clinic. Within two years, they cut potentially inappropriate medications by 26.8%. They didn’t just remove drugs - they replaced them with non-drug options: exercise for back pain, light therapy for sleep, social engagement for depression.

Community clinics struggle. Most primary care doctors have less than five minutes per patient to review meds. Medicare doesn’t pay for comprehensive reviews - only 15% of Medicare Advantage plans reimburse for them. That’s why many just keep renewing prescriptions. It’s easier.

A multidisciplinary team reviewing a patient's medication plan using a holographic risk score and non-drug alternatives.

The Hidden Barriers - And How to Overcome Them

Even when clinicians know what to do, they hit walls:

  • Fragmented care: 78% of older adults see five or more providers a year. No one has the full picture.
  • Poor documentation: Only 33% of electronic health records track medication adherence.
  • Patient fear: 68% of seniors are terrified of stopping a pill - even if it’s harmful. “My doctor gave me this - it must be important.”
  • Time and pay: A full medication review takes 45-60 minutes. Few clinics have the staff or funding.

Solutions exist. Telehealth is helping. In 2025, 75% of pharmacist-led reviews happened via video. That’s faster, more convenient, and just as effective. AI tools are emerging too. Epic’s new “Polypharmacy Risk Score” predicts ADEs with 87% accuracy by analyzing EHR data - dosage, age, kidney function, drug interactions.

But tech alone won’t fix this. It needs people. Teams. A pharmacist, a nurse, a social worker, and a doctor - all talking to each other and to the patient. The American Society of Consultant Pharmacists recommends one clinical pharmacist for every 1,200-1,500 older patients. Most clinics have zero.

What’s Coming Next

The future of geriatric polypharmacy is here - and it’s changing fast. In 2024, Medicare started penalizing doctors if more than 30% of their patients are on ten or more medications. That’s a financial nudge - and it’s working. Hospitals are finally paying attention.

The American Geriatrics Society is releasing Beers Criteria v2026 in late 2025, with new deprescribing algorithms built in. Researchers are testing personalized risk calculators that use genetic data to predict who’s most likely to have bad reactions. And the National Institute on Aging is prioritizing studies on how long it takes to safely stop psychotropic drugs - because sudden withdrawal causes 23.7% of adverse events in this group.

By 2030, experts predict comprehensive medication reviews will be standard care for every older adult. Why? Because value-based payment models now reward lower hospitalization rates - and polypharmacy is the #1 driver of preventable admissions.

What You Can Do Today

If you’re caring for an older adult:

  • Ask for a full medication list - from every provider. Write it down. Update it every six months.
  • Ask: “Which of these medicines are still necessary? Which ones might be doing more harm than good?”
  • Request a pharmacist-led review. Most hospitals and clinics can refer you.
  • Don’t stop anything cold. Work with a provider to taper safely.
  • Track changes: Did they sleep better? Fall less? Feel clearer? That’s the real measure of success.

Medications aren’t magic. They’re tools. And like any tool, they can be useful - or dangerous - depending on how they’re used. For older adults, the goal isn’t to take fewer pills. It’s to take the right ones - and only the ones that truly matter.

13 Comments

Kayleigh Campbell
Kayleigh Campbell
December 15, 2025 AT 03:53

So we’ve got a 12-pill daily ritual for Grandma and nobody’s asking if she’s actually *feeling* better or just less likely to sue the hospital? 😅
It’s like giving a toddler a Swiss Army knife and calling it ‘safety gear.’
Doctors aren’t evil-they’re just drowning in 15-minute visits and EHR pop-ups that scream ‘PRESCRIBE!’
Meanwhile, the real hero? The pharmacist who actually *talks* to the patient instead of just checking boxes.
And yeah, I’ve seen it: someone swaps 4 sleep meds for CBT-I and suddenly they’re reading novels at 2 a.m. instead of staring at the ceiling like a confused owl.
It’s not about fewer pills-it’s about fewer *ghost prescriptions*.
Those meds that were written for a 65-year-old with a heartbeat and now just sit there like expired coupons.
Also, why is it that the drug with the longest name always ends up being the one that makes you hallucinate your cat is giving you tax advice?
STOPP/START is basically the ‘adulting checklist’ for geriatric meds.
And if your doctor doesn’t know what FORTA is, ask them if they’ve ever met a human being over 70.
Also, 38% of seniors are undertreated? So we’re both overmedicating AND undermedicating?
Yeah, our system’s not broken-it’s just on vacation and forgot to leave a forwarding address.

Dave Alponvyr
Dave Alponvyr
December 16, 2025 AT 10:42

Stop the pills. Not all at once. One at a time.
Watch. Listen.
That’s it.

SHAMSHEER SHAIKH
SHAMSHEER SHAIKH
December 18, 2025 AT 05:57

Indeed, the phenomenon of polypharmacy among geriatric populations is a deeply concerning, multifaceted, and tragically under-addressed issue in modern healthcare systems!
It is not merely a clinical matter, but a profound ethical and humanitarian crisis, wherein the sanctity of human dignity is often sacrificed at the altar of fragmented, siloed, and profit-driven medical practices!
The Beers Criteria, STOPP/START, and FORTA guidelines are not mere tools-they are lifelines, beacons of rationality in a sea of pharmaceutical inertia!
And yet, in nations like mine, where access to clinical pharmacists is scarce, and where primary care physicians are overburdened beyond endurance, these guidelines remain aspirational, not actionable!
It is imperative that governments, insurers, and medical institutions invest not merely in technology, but in human capital-trained, empowered, and compensated pharmacists who can sit, listen, and collaborate with the elderly and their families!
Moreover, the emotional terror that seniors feel when asked to discontinue a medication-rooted in blind trust in authority-is a psychological burden that demands compassion, not just clinical protocol!
Let us not forget: a pill is not a promise. A prescription is not a guarantee. And a doctor’s signature is not divine decree!
We must reframe medication as a dynamic, evolving partnership-not a static, unchangeable decree!
Thank you for this illuminating, urgent, and beautifully articulated piece!
May your words awaken the slumbering conscience of the medical establishment!
With profound respect and hope,
Shamsheer Shaikh

Arun ana
Arun ana
December 20, 2025 AT 02:42

Yeah this is so real 😅
My grandma took 11 pills and now she’s confused about her own name 😅
But she still won’t let us touch any of them 😅

Cassandra Collins
Cassandra Collins
December 21, 2025 AT 18:24

you know who’s behind this? the pharmaceutical giants. they pay doctors to keep prescribing. they don’t want you to stop. they want you addicted. that’s why they push ‘supplements’ too-those are just unregulated drugs with better marketing. the FDA is in their pocket. and the VA? they only started fixing it because they got sued. don’t trust anyone in white coats. even the pharmacists. they’re trained to follow the script. your best bet? stop everything cold turkey. and go live in the woods. no pills. no doctors. no lies.

Kitty Price
Kitty Price
December 23, 2025 AT 11:36

my 80-year-old neighbor just stopped her benzos last month. she’s been gardening again. and laughing. like, real laughing.
just one pill gone and the whole person came back 🌿❤️

Aditya Kumar
Aditya Kumar
December 25, 2025 AT 07:39

meh. they’ve been doing this since the 80s. nothing changed. why read it again?

Colleen Bigelow
Colleen Bigelow
December 27, 2025 AT 03:16

this is what happens when you let liberals run healthcare. you let some pharmacist decide what’s ‘necessary’ for your grandma? next they’ll take away her Social Security and tell her she’s ‘too frail’ to vote. this isn’t deprescribing-it’s eugenics with a clipboard. if she wants to take 12 pills, let her. if she falls, she falls. that’s her choice. government shouldn’t be playing doctor. and don’t even get me started on ‘behavioral plans’-next they’ll ban antidepressants because ‘you just need more yoga.’

Billy Poling
Billy Poling
December 28, 2025 AT 22:41

It is my considered opinion, based upon an extensive review of the extant literature, peer-reviewed meta-analyses, and clinical guidelines promulgated by the American Geriatrics Society, that the systemic issue of polypharmacy in geriatric populations constitutes not merely a clinical challenge, but a profound structural failure of the American healthcare delivery model, which has, for decades, prioritized volume over value, reimbursement over relationships, and algorithmic adherence over individualized patient-centered care.
Furthermore, the paucity of reimbursement for comprehensive medication reviews under Medicare Part D, coupled with the absence of standardized interprofessional communication protocols across primary care, specialty, and pharmacy domains, has engendered a fragmented, disjointed, and ultimately hazardous therapeutic environment wherein the elderly are rendered not as patients, but as data points in a pharmaceutical supply chain.
It is therefore imperative, nay, morally obligatory, that policy-makers institute universal reimbursement for pharmacist-led medication therapy management (MTM), mandate interoperability of electronic health records across all provider types, and establish mandatory geriatric pharmacotherapy competencies for all prescribers.
Without such structural interventions, the current trajectory of preventable adverse drug events will continue to escalate, resulting in increased morbidity, mortality, and fiscal burden upon the public health infrastructure.
One must ask: Is the cost of a 45-minute medication review truly greater than the cost of a 7-day hospitalization for a gastrointestinal bleed caused by NSAID overuse?
The answer, in my estimation, is self-evident.

Randolph Rickman
Randolph Rickman
December 30, 2025 AT 13:44

Y’all are making this sound like it’s rocket science. It’s not. It’s just… care.
Stop treating old people like broken machines that need more parts.
Ask them what they want. Listen. Then act.
And for god’s sake, hire more pharmacists. They’re the ones who actually remember your name and ask how your dog is doing.
That’s the magic ingredient. Not tech. Not guidelines. Just… someone who gives a damn.
You can’t code compassion. But you can hire it.

sue spark
sue spark
January 1, 2026 AT 06:32

my mom’s on seven meds and she says she feels clearer since they took away the antihistamine for her ‘allergies’
no one ever asked if she had allergies
she just took it because it was on the list
she didn’t even know why
we should ask more questions
not just stop things

Tiffany Machelski
Tiffany Machelski
January 2, 2026 AT 05:55

i think this is so importent. my aunt was on 14 pills and now shes down to 6 and she can walk agin. i wish more docotrs did this. but they are so busy. and the system is broken. but i’m glad someone is talking about it

Dave Alponvyr
Dave Alponvyr
January 2, 2026 AT 19:38

That’s the thing. You don’t fix it with more paperwork.
You fix it with time.
And time costs money.
And no one wants to pay.
So we keep giving pills.
And hoping.

Write a comment